Comments on: Autoblog: Text/Content Spinning

By: Hudson

Hudson — Tue, 03 May 2011 19:42:17 +0000

Right now we have search and replace features that can handle custom commands… they are not globally applicable but they can be setup per campaign.

By: OJ

OJ — Tue, 03 May 2011 18:07:36 +0000

No list here, but I want to be able to customize a synonym list for different niches because the words or terms are different for each market..

Can you do a simple find and replace php array function script because I want to have unique content for different markets

By: Hudson

Hudson — Thu, 28 Apr 2011 18:50:57 +0000

Right now, not currently, but I’m brooding on a way we could do this. Alternatively you could send me you list and I could include it.

By: OJ

OJ — Thu, 28 Apr 2011 17:56:43 +0000

can I customize my own synonym list or do I have to use your list of synonyms in your database

By: Danny Thomas

Danny Thomas — Fri, 03 Sep 2010 01:17:11 +0000

Contentboss is much better now. I don’t know whether he’s using a learning engine or what.

I don’t understand why this guy came here to spam the blogsense blog. If he simply made a rewriter plugin for WordPress it could be used with blogsense or any other autoblog plugin.

He could charge per wrangle.

By: Ken Sampson

Ken Sampson — Tue, 24 Aug 2010 13:10:32 +0000

In defence I have used ThebestSpinner and I was a member of ContentBoss for a while, guess which one I am still using, hint – it isn’t ContentBoss!!.
I have come to the conclusion that to get true rewritten content that make sense you need to spend some time rewriting it yourself then use a spinner like TheBestspinner to not only substitute synonyms but to spin whole sentences.

You cannot 100% rely on automated spinning because you’ll end up with gibberrish somewhere in your article.

By: ContentBoss

ContentBoss — Tue, 20 Jul 2010 11:44:35 +0000

Glad you agree, although you should also realise that ‘the best spinner’ is just a tool for newbies, really. Expecting it to produce readable text without errors on ‘automatic’ mode is hopeful in the extreme, because sentence construction is a ‘binary’ operation, not a ‘statistical’ one (i.e. a sentence is right or wrong, not 75% right). Every now and then we extract the database from ‘the best spinner’ to have a bit of a laugh, because as you might expect of an unedited collaborative thesaurus, there are some howlers in there. And when I say ‘some’, I mean easily enough for the search engines to spot it. If *we* can spot ‘best spinner’ spun stuff, you can bet your bottom dollar Google can too. Just a heads up there before you go to all the trouble of integrating the bs spinner ‘api’.

By: adbox

adbox — Mon, 05 Jul 2010 16:52:35 +0000

In the beginnings we did use the translation method but it was never recommended. These days there is a custom token-phrase exchange system for spinning, similar to the best spinner’s api, but possibly not as good.

I’d say text is spun 12-16% and retaining readability in almost all circumstances.

There are also plans to integrate the best spinner’s api (optional).

And studying up on new site creation, I believe mashing up duplicate content creating original presentations are more affective than any kind of spinning.

By: ContentBoss

ContentBoss — Mon, 05 Jul 2010 14:30:17 +0000

The spinning feature seems to use text translation. Although you’ve somehow managed to find a half decent translation example, in the real world this is a VERY dangerous technique, as it tends to produce syntactical errors that appear similar to the errors produced by cheap spinners, which are easily picked up by most search engines nowadays (most base it on anti-markov statistical analysis). They catch you doing this, you’ll be sorry.